Improving Children 'S Creativity Through Question and Answer Method (Case Study at Asrun Indah Jaya Kindergarten, Kendari)

Abstract

The problem faced by Arsun Indah Jaya Kendari Kindergarten is the low achievement of their deep learning  creativity. This is due to the learning methods that are not in accordance with the characteristics of the Arsun Indah Jaya  Kendari Kindergarten . The teacher only uses conventional methods that do not attend kindergarten activities  and children's creativity in classroom learning. Researchers assume that the question and answer method is a solution to improving Kindergarten student learning outcomes. The formulation of the research problem is "whether the learning outcomes of children at Arsun Indah Jaya Kendari Kindergarten can be left at Kindergartenthrough the question and answer method "? as for the purpose of this research is to builds up Kindergarten child 's learning creativity results kindergarten Arsun Indah Jaya Kendari through the use of question and answer method. This type of research is a classroom action research conducted at the Arsun Indah Jaya Kendari Kindergarten , with a total of 40 students. The factors examined in this study were (1) the factor of children's learning creativity, (2) the teacher factor and (3) the children's factor. This researcher was carried out in 2 cycles with the implementation procedure (1) planning, (2) implementing the action, (3) observation, and (4) analysis and reflection. The results of this study indicate that based on the results of the research and discussion, it is concluded that the learning outcomes of the Arsun Indah Jaya Kendari Kindergarten can be at the kindergarten level through the use of the question and answer method. This can be seen from the increase in the average value and the percentage of student learning completeness. The average score of the children as students' learning completeness reached 80.00%. The average learning outcomes and student learning completeness have increased after learning improvement actions were taken in this study. The average student learning outcomes in cycle I was 73.28 increasing to 77.50 in cycle II. The percentage of student learning completeness in cycle I was 52.5% increasing to 80.00% in cycle II.