Jigsaw Type of Cooperative Learning Model to Increase Learning Outcome in Learning Principal Science: Composition of Human and Animal Respiratory Organs
Keywords:
Jigsaw, Respiratory organs, Learning outcomes.Abstract
This research is motivated by the low value of science subjects at SDN 100 Kendari which is caused by the science learning process that has been carried out so far still applying traditional learning patterns. Based on the above background, the following problems are formulated: (1) How is the application of jigsaw type cooperative learning in increasing mastery of concepts on the subject of Human and animal respiratory organ structure for fifth grade students at SDN 100 Kendari and (2) Can the application of the jigsaw type cooperative learning model improve science learning outcomes for fifth graders at SDN 100 Kendari? This study aims to: (1) Increased student reasoning skills class V SDN 100 Kendari material Milk nan respiratory organs of humans and animals use jigsaw type cooperative learning model; (2) Improved learning outcomes of fifth graders at SDN 100 Kendari on the subject of human and animal respiratory organ structure using Jigsaw cooperative learning ; and (3) Increasing the ability of teachers to guide students by applying the jigsaw type cooperative learning model in studying the composition of human and animal respiratory organs at SDN 100 Kendari.
This type of research is classroom action research, as a research procedure that produces descriptive data in the form of written or spoken words from observable evaluation results. The population of this study was the fifth-grade students of SDN 100 Kendari, totaling 28 people. The results obtained indicate that the application of the jigsaw type cooperative learning model can improve the learning outcomes of fifth grade students at SDN 100 Kendari for science subjects. The achievement of performance indicators has been achieved where the classical average in the first cycle reaches 73.23 and the percentage of classical completeness is 77. .93, while in the second cycle there was an increase where the classical average had reached 78.57 and the classical completeness percentage had reached 82.14. Based on this, the performance indicators in this study are the classical average of 75 and the classical percentage of success is 80%.
References
Achyar, dkk. 1998. Cooperative Learning Strategies In The Teaching Of general Science at Lower Secondary Level. Bandung: PPPGT.
Aswati. 2002. Upaya Peningkatan Mutu Pembelajaran PPKn Dengan Menggunakan Metode Jigsaw di SLTP Negeri 9 Kendari. Karya Tulis. Kendari
Conny Semiawan, dkk. 1985. Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia
Dimyati, Mudjiono.1999. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.
Gane, Briggs, Wager.2012. Prinsip Disain Pembelajaran. Penerbit UNJ. Jakarta.
Hadis,Abdul. 2006. Psikologi Dalam Pendidikan. Penerbit Alfabeta. Bandung
Hadiyanto. 2004. Mencari Sosok Desentralisasi Manajemen Pendidikan Di Indonesia. Jakarta. Penerbit Rineka Cipta.
Hamalik.Oemar. 2001. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung. Bumi Aksara.
……………….. 2008. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung. Bumi Aksara.
Hakim Thursan. 2004. Belajar Secara Efektif. Jakarta. Puspa Swara.
Ibrahim Muslimin, dkk. 2000. Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Surabaya: Universitas Press
Lie Anita. 1999. Metode Pembelajaran Gotong Royong.Surabaya. Citra Media.
Mahmud, dimyati, 1990. Psikologi Pendidikan. FIP-IKIP. Yokyakarta: BPFE
Mardalis. 2002. Metode Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Proposal. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Milwan. 2004. Milwan, Tanjung Toronipa Dengan Teknik Jigsaw Dalam Pendekatan Lingkungan Sebagai Sumber Pembelajaran Biologi Yang Berorientasi Pada CTL (Contekstual Teaching And Learning) Siswa SMP Negeri 9 Kendari. Karya Tulis. Kendari
Moeslichatoen, R. 1989. Interaksi belajar Mengajar. Malang:FIP IKIP.
Moleong, Lexy J. 2001. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Rosdakarya
Mudjiono, Dimyati. 1999. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.
Nur dan Samani, Muchlas, 1996. Teori Pembelajaran dan Hakekat Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses. Jakarta: Depdikbud
Rusyan,A.T. 1989. Pendekatan Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. CV. Remaja Rosda Karya. Bandung
Sardiman, A.M. 1990. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Slameto. 1988. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Bina Aksara
Slavin, Robert E., (1995) Cooperatif Learning: Teory, research, and Practice. Secon edition. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon Publisher.
Stahl Robert. J., (1994). Cooperative Learning And Social Studies: Hand Book For Teacher. USA: Kane Publishing Service, inc
Sutikno Sobry.M.2005. Pembelajaran Efektif. Mataram. Penerbit NTP Press.
Usman, Setiawati. 2001 Upaya optimalisasi Belajar Mengajar.Bandung. PT.Remaja RosdaKarya
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 International Association of Management and Human Resource Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.