Jigsaw Type of Cooperative Learning Model to Increase Learning Outcome in Learning Principal Science: Composition of Human and Animal Respiratory Organs

Authors

  • Walmiati Teacher of SDN 100 Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi Indonesia

Keywords:

Jigsaw, Respiratory organs, Learning outcomes.

Abstract

This research is motivated by the low value of science subjects at SDN 100 Kendari which is caused by the science learning process that has been carried out so far still applying traditional learning patterns. Based on the above background, the following problems are formulated: (1) How is the application of jigsaw type cooperative learning in increasing mastery of concepts on the subject of Human and animal respiratory organ structure for fifth grade students at SDN 100 Kendari and (2) Can the application of the jigsaw type cooperative learning model improve science learning outcomes for fifth graders at SDN 100 Kendari? This study aims to: (1) Increased student reasoning skills class V SDN 100 Kendari material Milk nan respiratory organs of humans and animals  use  jigsaw type cooperative learning model; (2) Improved learning outcomes of fifth graders at SDN 100 Kendari on the  subject of human and animal respiratory organ structure using Jigsaw cooperative learning ; and (3) Increasing the ability of teachers to guide students by applying the jigsaw type cooperative learning model in studying the composition of human and animal respiratory organs at SDN 100 Kendari.

This type of research is classroom action research, as a research procedure that produces descriptive data in the form of written or spoken words from observable evaluation results. The population of this study was the fifth-grade students of SDN 100 Kendari, totaling 28 people. The results obtained indicate that the application of the jigsaw type cooperative learning model can improve the learning outcomes of fifth grade students at SDN 100 Kendari for science subjects. The achievement of performance indicators has been achieved where the classical average in the first cycle reaches 73.23 and the percentage of classical completeness is 77. .93, while in the second cycle there was an increase where the classical average had reached 78.57 and the classical completeness percentage had reached 82.14. Based on this, the performance indicators in this study are the classical average of 75 and the classical percentage of success is 80%. 

References

Achyar, dkk. 1998. Cooperative Learning Strategies In The Teaching Of general Science at Lower Secondary Level. Bandung: PPPGT.

Aswati. 2002. Upaya Peningkatan Mutu Pembelajaran PPKn Dengan Menggunakan Metode Jigsaw di SLTP Negeri 9 Kendari. Karya Tulis. Kendari

Conny Semiawan, dkk. 1985. Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia

Dimyati, Mudjiono.1999. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.

Gane, Briggs, Wager.2012. Prinsip Disain Pembelajaran. Penerbit UNJ. Jakarta.

Hadis,Abdul. 2006. Psikologi Dalam Pendidikan. Penerbit Alfabeta. Bandung

Hadiyanto. 2004. Mencari Sosok Desentralisasi Manajemen Pendidikan Di Indonesia. Jakarta. Penerbit Rineka Cipta.

Hamalik.Oemar. 2001. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung. Bumi Aksara.

……………….. 2008. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung. Bumi Aksara.

Hakim Thursan. 2004. Belajar Secara Efektif. Jakarta. Puspa Swara.

Ibrahim Muslimin, dkk. 2000. Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Surabaya: Universitas Press

Lie Anita. 1999. Metode Pembelajaran Gotong Royong.Surabaya. Citra Media.

Mahmud, dimyati, 1990. Psikologi Pendidikan. FIP-IKIP. Yokyakarta: BPFE

Mardalis. 2002. Metode Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Proposal. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Milwan. 2004. Milwan, Tanjung Toronipa Dengan Teknik Jigsaw Dalam Pendekatan Lingkungan Sebagai Sumber Pembelajaran Biologi Yang Berorientasi Pada CTL (Contekstual Teaching And Learning) Siswa SMP Negeri 9 Kendari. Karya Tulis. Kendari

Moeslichatoen, R. 1989. Interaksi belajar Mengajar. Malang:FIP IKIP.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2001. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Rosdakarya

Mudjiono, Dimyati. 1999. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.

Nur dan Samani, Muchlas, 1996. Teori Pembelajaran dan Hakekat Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses. Jakarta: Depdikbud

Rusyan,A.T. 1989. Pendekatan Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. CV. Remaja Rosda Karya. Bandung

Sardiman, A.M. 1990. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Slameto. 1988. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Bina Aksara

Slavin, Robert E., (1995) Cooperatif Learning: Teory, research, and Practice. Secon edition. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon Publisher.

Stahl Robert. J., (1994). Cooperative Learning And Social Studies: Hand Book For Teacher. USA: Kane Publishing Service, inc

Sutikno Sobry.M.2005. Pembelajaran Efektif. Mataram. Penerbit NTP Press.

Usman, Setiawati. 2001 Upaya optimalisasi Belajar Mengajar.Bandung. PT.Remaja RosdaKarya

Downloads

Published

2021-07-06

How to Cite

Walmiati, W. (2021). Jigsaw Type of Cooperative Learning Model to Increase Learning Outcome in Learning Principal Science: Composition of Human and Animal Respiratory Organs . International Journal of Management and Education in Human Development, 1(03), 22–36. Retrieved from https://ijmehd.com/index.php/ijmehd/article/view/149