Stad-Type Cooperative Learning Model with Talking Stick to Increase Learning Outcomes in Object Composing Particle Material
Keywords:
STAD, Talking Stick, Learning Outcomes.Abstract
This study aims to improve product learning outcomes and social skills of class IX students on the material constituent particles through the application of a combination of STAD type cooperative learning model with talking stick MTsN 2 Kendari. This research was conducted in the even semester of the 2019/2020 school year, at SMP MTsN 2 Kendari in class IX students totaling 21 students consisting of 11 male students and 10 female students. Factors observed in this study were student factors and teacher factors. This research was carried out in 2 (two) cycles, including: a) planning; b) implementation of actions; c) observation and evaluation; d) reflection. The data obtained in this study were analyzed using descriptive statistics which are intended to provide an overview of improving student learning outcomes who are taught through the application of the STAD type cooperative learning model with talking stick. The results showed that through the application of a combination of STAD type cooperative learning model with talking stick can increase student and teacher activity where in the first cycle the average student activity was 3.4 (Slightly Good) then after learning was carried out in the second cycle the average student activity increased to 3 ,8 (good) and the average teacher activity in the first cycle is 3.2 (good enough) then after the second cycle is carried out it becomes 3.8 (good). Through the application of the STAD type cooperative learning model with talking stick it can improve student learning outcomes on the material constituent particles where the average student learning outcomes in the first cycle are 71.42 with the percentage of student learning completeness that is 71.42% and after the evaluation is carried out in the second cycle then the average student learning outcomes become 78.09 with a percentage of student learning completeness of 90.47% so that the Minimum Completeness Criteria for schools, namely at least 75% of students obtaining a score of 70 can be achieved.
References
Abubakar, S.R., 2006. Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Belajar dan Pembelajaran. FKIP Universitas Haluoleo. Kendari.
Anonim, 2002. Model-Model Pembelajaran Alternatif. Depdikbud. Jakarta.
Arikunto, S., Suhardjono dan Supardi, 2006. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
Corebima A.D., Muslimin Ibrahim Rinie Pratiwi Puspitawati. 2002. Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Ditjen Dikdasmen Depdiknas. Jakarta.
Dimyati dan Mudjiono. 1994. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.
Erniyati, 2006. Efektivitas Pembelajaran Konsep Gelombang Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe NHT (Number Head Together) dengan Talking Stick pada Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 3 Kendari. Skripsi FKIP Universitas Haluoleo. Kendari.
Henny, 2002. Kombinasi Metode Mengajar Untuk Mengurangi Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal-Soal Fisika Pada SMU Negeri 1 Raha (Suatu Kajian Tindakan). Skripsi FKIP Universitas Haluoleo Kendari.
Ibrahim, M., 2002. Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Depdiknas. Jakarta.
, 2003. Pengajaran Berbasis Masalah. Ditjen Dikdasmen Depdiknas. Jakarta.
Kunandar, 2007. Guru Profesional. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Lasmawan, 1997. Efektivitas Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif di Sekolah. Universitas Negeri Makassar. Makassar.
Nurhadi, 2004. Kurikulum 2004. Grasindo. Jakarta.
Sanjaya,W., 2005. Pembelajaran dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Prenada Media Group. Jakarta.
Silberman, M.L., 2006. Active Learning 101 Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif. Nusamedia. Bandung.
Sirih, M., M. Ali dan Ruwiah Pua, 2007. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dengan Tongkat Estafet untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Sistem Pencernaan Makanan (Kajian Tindakan di Kelas IX IA). Universitas Haluoleo. Kendari.
Sudjana, N., 2002. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. PT. Remaja Rosadakarya. Bandung.
Suherman, E., 2008. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (online)
(http: //Pkab.Model-pembelajaran-pdf. 2008/04/29.Wordfress.com.,)
Syaifuddin, 2006. Anatomi Fisiologi untuk Siswa Perawat. Penerbit buku Kedokteran. Bandung.
Usman, M.U. dan Lilis Setiawati. 2001. Upaya Optimalisasi Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.
Wahyuni, 2009. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stad Dengan Tongkat Refleks Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Gerak Refleks Pada Manusia Di Kelas Ix B Smp Negeri 2 Kendari (Penelitian Tindakan Kelas). Skripsi Fkip Universitas Haluoleo. Kendari.
Winataputra, U.S., 2000. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Depdikbud. Jakarta.
Wahyudin, D., Supriadi dan Abduhak, I., 2007. Pengantar Pendidikan. Penerbit Universitas Terbuka. Jakarta.
Yamin, M. dan Ansari, B.I., 2008. Taktik Mengembangkan Kemampuan Individu Siswa. Gaung Persada Press. Jakarta.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 International Association of Management and Human Resource Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.