Countering the Bomb Terror Threat by the Gegana Detachment of the Southeast Sulawesi Mobile Brigade Unit

Authors

  • La Ode Muhram Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara
  • Niken Yulian Yusuf Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia
  • Wa Ode Intan Kurniawati Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia
  • Supriadi Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia
  • La Ode Hariru Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia
  • Arief Rachman Zainuddin Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia

Keywords:

Bomb Terror, Gegana Detachment, Mobile Brigade Unit

Abstract

The era of reform has inspired a spirit of renewal, a spirit of repair, arrangement, and improvement which consciously highlights various inequalities, deviations, and disproportionate things. The separation of the National Police from the TNI is one of the agendas that occurred in the reform era, and it is a demand from the public who wants changes in the performance of the National Police in carrying out their duties, as stated in Article 13 of Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Police of the Republic of Indonesia, which states that: The main task of the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia is to maintain security and public order, enforce the law and provide protection, guidance and service to the community. One of the progress of the National Police that is worth noting as part of efforts to improve police performance since the separation from the TNI is the disclosure of bomb cases in Indonesia using the Scientific Crime Investigation (SCI) method, as a term that can be tested. For example, the disclosure of the Bali bombing case, which was initially doubted by many parties, regarding the ability of the National Police to uncover the case, even when the National Police were able to uncover the Bali bombing 1 step by step, unpleasant accusations were immediately heard, that the National Police had engineered the case. This type of research is included in the category of normative legal research. 2 factors, namely supporting factors and inhibiting factors. These factors are as follows:1. Supporting Factors 2. Inhibiting Factors. one of the suggestions given that the application of the Retroactive principle to cases of criminal acts of terrorism will not violate Human Rights because retroactivity is vulnerable to violations of Human Rights, however, the need for retroactive application is highly desirable, nowadays considering that the impact of criminal acts of terrorism is very broad and systemic.

References

BOOKS

Agus Surya Bakti, 2014, Darurat Terorisme, Kebijakan Pencegahan, Perlindungan dan Deradikalisasi, Jakarta: Daulat Press.

-------, 2012, Organisasi dan Manajemen, Jakarta: Rajawali Press. Mardenis, 2011, Pemberantasan Terorisme, Politik Internasional dan Politik Hukum Nasional Indonesia, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin, 2014, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Andreas Heri Susidarto, 2004, Pelayanan Pengaduan Ancaman Bom Di Jakarta Oleh Detasemen B Satuan I Gegana Brimob, Jakarta: Perpustakaan

Bambang Sunggono, 2005, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Benny Sukadis, 2007, Almanak Reformasi Sektor Keamanan Indonesia. Jakarta: Lesperssi-DCAF.

Budi Hardiman, F., et.al., 2003, Terorisme: Definisi, Aksi dan Regulasi, Jakarta: Imparsial.

Burhan Ashshofa, 2003, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Cet. ke-2, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

C.S.T.Kansil dan Christine S.T. Kansil, 2000, Hukum Tata Negara Republik Indonesia, Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Djoko Sutono PTIK. Ari Wibowo, 2012, Hukum Pidana Terorisme: Kebijakan Formulatif Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Djoko Sutono PTIK. Soejono Soekanto, 2001, Sosiologi sebagai pengantar, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Ediwarman, 2014, Monograf Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Panduan Penulisan Tesis dan Disertasi), Medan.

Edy Suhardono, 2004, Teori Peran (Konsep, Derivasi dan Implikasinya), Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Elmatera Publishing. Louise Richardson, 2006, What Terrorists Want, Understanding the Terrorist Threat, London: John Murray. M. Solly Lubis, 2012, Filsafat Ilmu Dan Penelitian, Medan: Softmedia.

Faisal Salam, 2005, Motivasi Tindakan Terorisme, Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Faisal Sulaiman, 2007, Who is the real terrorist? Menguak Mitos Kejahatan Terorisme, Yogjakarta:

H.R. Abdussalam, 2009, Hukum Kepolisian Sebagai Hukum Positif dalam Disiplin Hukum, Jakarta:

I Made Wirartha, 2006, Pedoman Penulisan Usulan Penelitian, Skripsi Dan Tesis, Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Indriyanto Seno Adji, 2001, Terorisme dan HAM dalam Terorisme: Tragedi Umat Manusia. Jakarta : O.C. Kaligis & Associates.

Johnny Ibrahim, 2005, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Malang: Bayumedia.

Joko Subagyo, P., 2011, Metode Penelitian Dalam Teori & Praktik, Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta. King

Mahrus Ali, 2012, Hukum Pidana Terorisme Teori dan Praktik, Jakarta : Gramata Publishing.

Muchamad Ali Syafa‟at, 2003, “Tindak Pidana Teror Belenggu Baru bagi Kebebasan” dalam Terorism, Definisi, Aksi dan Regulasi, Jakarta: Imparsial.

Mudzakkir, 2008, Pengkajian Hukum tentang Perlindungan Hukum bagi korban Terorisme, Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI.

Mukti Fajar N.D dan Yulianto Achmad, 2010, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Munir, 2003, Menanti Kebijakan Hati Terorisme dalam Buku Terorisme, Definisi, Aksi dan Regulasi, Jakarta: Imparsial. 152

Paul Wilkinson, 2001, Terorism versus Democracy: The Liberal State Response, Routledge: Oxon.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2008, Penelitian Hukum, Cet. ke-4, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Pudi Rahardi, 2012, Hukum Kepolisian, Kemandirian, Profesionalisme dan Reformasi Polri, Surabaya: Laksbang Grafika.

Restu Agung. 150 151 Hazairin dalam Wasito Hadi Utomo, 2012, Hukum Kepolisian di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: LPIP.

Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, 1990, Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, Cetakan Keempat.

Sarlito Wirawan Sarwono, 2015, Teori- Teori Psikologi Sosial, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sharly Sollu, 2008, Responsibilitas Unit Jibom Detasemen Gegana Sat Brimobda Metro Jaya Dalam Pelayanan Kepada Masyarakat, Jakarta: Perpustakaan

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 2012, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Edisi 1. Cet. Ke-14 Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

-------, 2000, Ringkasan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Empiris, Jakarta: Ind Hill Co.

-------, 2002, Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar, Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

-------, 2014, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: UI-Press.

Sudarto, 1990, Hukum Pidana I, Semarang: Yayasan Sudarto, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.

Sukawarsini Djelantik, 2010, Terorisme Tinjauan Psiko Politik, Peran Media, Kemiskinan, Dan Keamanan Sosial, Jakarta: Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Sumadi Suryabrata, 2006, Metodologi Penelitian, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, 2002, Selamatkan Negeri Kita dari Terorisme, Jakarta: Kementerian Polkam.

Zainuddin Ali, 2011, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Cet. ke-3, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Legislation

Criminal Code. Republic of Indonesia

Government Regulation in Law of the Republic of Indonesia no. 1 of 2002 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism. Republic of Indonesia

RI Perppu. No. 2 of 2002, Implementation of Government Regulation in Law of the Republic of Indonesia no. 1 of 2002 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism, in the Bali Bombing Incident on 12 October 2002. Republic of Indonesia Law Number 1 of 1946 concerning Criminal Law Regulations.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-26

How to Cite

Muhram, L. O., Yusuf, N. Y., Kurniawati, W. O. I., Supriadi, S., Hariru, L. O., & Zainuddin, A. R. (2023). Countering the Bomb Terror Threat by the Gegana Detachment of the Southeast Sulawesi Mobile Brigade Unit. International Journal of Management and Education in Human Development, 3(04), 1044–1050. Retrieved from https://ijmehd.com/index.php/ijmehd/article/view/259