Forms of Coaching for Recidivist Inmates Convicted of Motor Vehicle Theft: A Case Study at Kendari Class II/A Detention Center

Authors

  • Susylo Tias Aji Nugroho Criminal Law Specialization Program of Faculty of Law, Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara
  • St. Fatmawati L. Faculty of Law, University of Southeast Sulawesi
  • Niken Yulian Yusuf Faculty of Law, University of Southeast Sulawesi

Keywords:

Correctional Guidance, Detention Center Study, Inmate Coaching, Motor Vehicle Theft, Recidivism

Abstract

This study examines the factors contributing to theft crimes among recidivist inmates and the effectiveness of their rehabilitation at Class II Kendari State Detention Center in Indonesia, using a normative-empirical approach. Data were gathered through document analysis, field surveys, and interviews, with findings analyzed via qualitative descriptive methods. Internal factors include economic pressures, habitual criminality or addiction, lack of family visits, and revenge motives from prior victimization. External factors encompass environmental influences shaping behavior, alongside development-related issues such as mass media exposure to new crime patterns, social heterogeneity, wealth disparities, limited opportunities for low-educated individuals, and rising individualism. Rehabilitation outcomes under Indonesian law are shaped by facility design, organizational structure, leadership quality, staff competence and numbers, management practices, officer welfare, infrastructure availability, sufficient funding, natural resources, program diversity, and related inmate issues. These elements highlight structural barriers to effective recidivism reduction in correctional settings.

References

Andi Hamzah dan Siti Rahayu, 2003, Suatu Tinjauan Ringkasan Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia, Pradnya Paramita Jakarta.

Andi Hamzah, 2003. Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia. Pradnya Paramita Jakarta

Bambang Poernomo, 2006. Pelaksanaan Pidana Penjara Dengan Sistem Pemasyarakatan, Liberty Jogjakarta.

Berda Namawi Arief, 2006. Kebijakan Legislatif Dengan Pidana Penjara.

Badan Penerbit UNDIP. Semarang , 2002. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Citra aditya Bakti, Bandung.

---------------------, 2003. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Citra Aditya Bakti Bandung.

Dwidja Priyatno, 2006. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. STHB Press. Bandung

-----------------,2006. Sistem Pelaksanaan Pidana Penjara Di Indonesia. Rafika Aditama. Bandung

Moeljatno, 2005. Membangun Hukum Pidana. Bina Aksara. Jakarta.

Muladi dan Bada Namawi Arief, 2004. Teori-Teori Kebijakan Pidana. Alumni. Bandung

Muladi, 2005. Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat. Alumni. Bandung

-------------------, 2005. Kapita Selekta Peradilan Pidana. Badan Penerbit UNIDIP. Semarang.

P.A.F. Lamintang, 2004. Hukum Penitensier Indonesia. Armico. Bandung Roeslan Saleh, 2003. Stelsel Pidana Indonesia. Aksara Baru. Jakarta. Soedarto R, 2001. Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Alumni Bandung. Sholehuddin, 2003. Filsafat Pemidanaan. Aksara Baru. Jakarta.

Formal Legal References

Law Number 12 of 1995 on Correctional System, as amended by Law Number 22 of 2022 on the Correctional System.

The Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP).

Great Dictionary of the Indonesian Language, Third Edition (2001)

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Aji Nugroho, S. T., Fatmawati L., S., & Yusuf, N. Y. (2025). Forms of Coaching for Recidivist Inmates Convicted of Motor Vehicle Theft: A Case Study at Kendari Class II/A Detention Center. International Journal of Management and Education in Human Development, 5(03), 1629–1636. Retrieved from https://ijmehd.com/index.php/ijmehd/article/view/333