Incest in the Intersection Between Criminal Law and Bugis Custom

Authors

  • Hijriani Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia
  • La Ode Bariun Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara,Indonesia
  • Rahman Hasima Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Rizki Ramadani Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Keywords:

Incest, Criminal law, Bugis Custom

Abstract

This article will explain the case of incest, which is the most severe and despicable Malaweng Kedo (decency) offense of all customary offenses in Bugis Land. People can be sentenced to death by drowning in the sea (ri labu) or falling off a cliff for this act. While the articles imposed in the Criminal Code only refer to Article 294, Articles 8 through Article 48 of Law Number 23 of 2004 On the Elimination of Domestic Violence (PKDRT), and Articles 81 and 82 of Law Number 35 of 2014 On the Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 On the Child Protection. Then, under the provisions of Articles 490, 497, and 498 of the RKUHP, the incest offense is transformed into a new offense. This article employs qualitative research based on normative juridical methods to examine theoretical legal materials concerning the principles, conceptions, doctrines, and legal norms related to incest cases. The purpose of this research is to investigate and determine the intersection of criminal law and Bugis custom in the effectiveness of using the law to catch incest perpetrators. According to the findings of this study, several District Courts can hear and decide customary offenses whose jurisdiction is customary courts, and there is jurisprudence that recognizes the existence of customary offenses. This demonstrates that Bugis Criminal and Customary Law can complement each other, as evidenced by the recognition of customary community settlement practices through court decisions, the formation of positive law referring to "living law" in society, and the discovery of judge law based on legal values ​​that exist in society.

References

Amanda, Amanda, and Hetty Krisnani. “Analisis Kasus Anak Perempuan Korban Pemerkosaan Inses.” Focus : Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial 2, no. 1 (2019): 120. https://doi.org/10.24198/focus.v2i1.23129.

Andari, Soetji. “Dampak Sosial Dan Psikologi Korban Inses.” Publiciana 11, no. 1 (2017): 184.

Artika, I Wayan. Incest. Jakarta: Iterprebook, 2008.

Carter, J. W. “Incest.” The Encyclopedia of Women and Crime, 2019, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118929803.ewac0290.

Drs. Mattulada. Bugis-Makasar, Manusia Dan Kebudayaannya. Berita Antropolog. Jakarta: Fak. Sastra UI, n.d.

Eddyono, Supriyadi Widodo. “Merekonstruksi Ulang Kejahatan Inses Di Indonesia.” Legislasi Indonesia 7 (2010): 302.

———. Tindak Pidana Inses Dalam Rancangan RKUHP. Edited by Anggara. Jakarta Selatan: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, 2016.

———. “Tindak Pidana Inses Dalam RUU KUHP | Aliansi Nasional Reformasi KUHP,” 2008.

H. Ahmad Ubbe, S.H., M.H., APU. “Laporan Akhir Penelitian Hukum Tentang Perkembangan Hukum Adat Di Propinsi Sulawesi Selatan.” Jakarta, 2005.

Hijriani and Herman. “The Value of Siri ’ Na Pacce as an Alternative to Settle Persecution.” Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 3, no. 3 (2018): 564.

Mindlin, Jessica. “Child Sexual Abuse and Criminal Statutes of Limitation: A Model for Reform.” Washington Law Review 65, no. 189 (1990).

Murdiyanto, and Tri Gutomo. “Penyebab, Dampak, Dan Pencegahan Inses.” Jurnal Media Informasi Penelitian Kesejahteraan Sosial 43, no. 1 (2019): 55.

PAUDPEDIA. “Sebanyak 3.683 Anak Menjadi Korban Kekerasan Selama Januari Hingga Juni 2021,” n.d.

Penerjemah, Tim BPHN. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Jakarta: Sinar Harapan, 1983.

Putra, Ilham Pratama. “KemenPPPA Terima 3.122 Laporan Kekerasan Terhadap Anak Sepanjang 2021 - Medcom.Id,” n.d.

R. Soepomo. Bab-Bab Tentang Hukum Adat. Cetakan ke. Jakarta: PT. Pradnya Paramita, 2007.

Rahmad Dwi Putra Santosa. “Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Inses/Incest Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Nasional.” Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum 26, no. 7 (2020): 895.

Retnaningrum, Dwi Hapsari. “Incest Sebagai Bentuk Manifestasi Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 9, no. 1 (2009): 20.

Sawrikar, P. “Mencegah Penyalahgunaan Seksual Anak (CSA) Di Komunitas Etnis Minoritas : Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur Dan Saran Untuk Latihan Di Australia. Anak-Anak Dan Remaja Jasa.” 2017, n.d. https://doi.org/10,1016, 85, 174-186.

Soerjono Soekanto. Masa Depan Hukum Adat Di Indonesia, Makalah Pada Seminar Penelaahan Pembaharuan Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: BPHN, 1982.

Soerjono Soekanto and Soleman Taneko. Hukum Adat Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 1986.

Suyanto, Bagong, Medhy Aginta Hidayat, Rahma Sugihartati, Septi Ariadi, and Rendy Pahrun Wadipalapa. “Incestuous Abuse of Indonesian Girls: An Exploratory Study of Media Coverage.” Children and Youth Services Review 96 (2019): 364–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.034.

Wotulo, Fresdy A. “Kedudukan Delik Inses (Incest) Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Lex Crimen 6 Nomor 4 (2017): 38.

Yudaningsih, Lilik Purwastuti. “Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Inses Dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Hukum Pidana.” Inovatif VII, no. II (2014): 96.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-13

How to Cite

Hijriani, La Ode Bariun, Rahman Hasima, & Rizki Ramadani. (2022). Incest in the Intersection Between Criminal Law and Bugis Custom. International Journal of Management and Education in Human Development, 2(01), 064–071. Retrieved from https://ijmehd.com/index.php/ijmehd/article/view/52

Issue

Section

Articles